One would think that a corollary of a lack of common
sense would be a lack of confidence. For
years, however, I was fond of saying that I had a strong self-image, but that
it just wasn’t very accurate. I would
plunge ahead confidently with almost any task, blissfully unaware that I lacked
the ability to succeed. Afterward I
would say to myself, “I guess that is not an area I can succeed in. Not sure why.
I’ll try something else.” I spent
about ten years trying to build a legal, legitimate multi-level marketing
business, where the more you help other people succeed, the more you
succeed. Despite a great training and
support system, I just could not change, grow and become the person I needed to
become in order to succeed. That ten
year period came between ages 42 and 52 (1986 to 1996), by the way, during
which time I was a full-time consultant/contractor and putting our daughters
through college. I did give up marathon
racing in 1986, but continued to do long distance training runs during those years,
and many years thereafter. The point is
that the energy level and drive I showed during my own college days was still
there.
Early in the multi-level marketing training process, I
heard and continued to hear speakers say, “If I can do it, you can do it.” I believed them, because I wanted to believe
them. There were so many speakers saying
the same thing, I felt that logically either they were all lying, or it was
true, and I couldn’t believe they were all lying. There was also the possibility that they all
believed what they were saying, but they were all wrong. That didn’t seem likely, either. The common sense alternative that I finally
came to about five years after I gave up, is that what they were saying was theoretically true, but not as a
practical matter, akin to saying that anyone born in America can someday be
President.
I would combine this with the possibility that if someone
has an aptitude for something; if something comes easy for someone; they may
not realize that it is not easy, or even possible, for most others. I know now that the intangible personal
characteristics that it takes to attract, inspire and lead a group of
high-energy, overachievers (what we used to call “winners”) are rare
qualities. The fact that someone else
has these characteristics, or has acquired them, does not mean that the average
person can do so, just because he wants to.
The guy with the largest organization could say things
that most people might find offensive, but for those of us who wanted his
success, his words were received as challenges that served as “jet fuel in our
engines”, so to speak. He would say from
stage, speaking to thousands of attendees: “If I make in a week what you make in
a year, one of us is stupid, and it’s not me!”
Or how about: “I don’t want to know anything that a broke person knows;
it might be catching.” We were all
trying to “go Direct,” which meant sponsoring at least six “winners” and
creating and sustaining a certain level of business volume within our
groups. He would motivate us with things
like “Even a blind squirrel will find a nut once in awhile.” “A dog with a note
in his mouth can go Direct.” “Hell, I
could probably find six people to blow up the white house…at their own
expense!” “You are going to need six
pall bearers at your funeral; you better have at least six friends!” People who wouldn’t get involved in the
business or who did nothing with it, or who quit, he called “Losers.” He said, “When someone tells me they quit, I
say quit what? You ain’t been doing
nuthin to quit from.” All these sayings served as motivation to
those of us who saw ourselves as “winners.”
One guy said, “I figured nobody was twice as good as me. It
might take me twice as long to do half of what they did, but surely I could do
it, if they could.” That is where my
self-image was at, too. But try as I
might, I could not attract people who were both willing and able to build
multi-level marketing businesses down line from me. The business made such
logical sense to me that I couldn’t see why anyone would not be motivated
enough to get out of their comfort zones, go the extra mile, and make it
happen. I learned the hard way that
people are not all like me. I am a very
cooperative person. If a friend is a
chiropractor or barber or whatever, I am happy to give them my business. If the supermarket sign says, “please return
carts here,” I am happy to do it.
Imagine my surprise when “friends” started making up flimsy excuses to
not get involved in my business. I never
expected that and still don’t understand it.
To be fair, one of the speakers was fond of saying, “Who
you are speaks so loud that what you say I cannot hear.” There was also reference to “the music behind
the words,” which sort of means the same thing.
But I guess I thought I could and would change and become the person I
needed to be in order to succeed. After
ten years of honest effort, however, I began to doubt. My corollary to “If I can do it, you can do
it” became “Just because I can’t do it doesn’t mean that you can’t do it!” Of course, someone who really can do it is
going to recognize and steer clear of someone who cannot. Sandy and I actually got to the level where
we were asked to speak for 5-10 minutes, from stage, with microphones, to
several thousand people. By that time I
was accustomed to being on my feet before small groups making presentations, so
this was not a real stretch for me, but I marveled at Sandy. She handled it with ease, grace and good
humor.
I remember that all of the couples who were scheduled to
speak that weekend met with our Diamond, and some of the people seemed really
scared and nervous. This may be what
prompted our Diamond to tell us that if public speaking “breaks you,” it will
“make you,” but if it “makes you,” it will “break you.” What he meant was that if you get a big
charge out of being up there getting the attention, and it makes you feel like
a big shot, you will not relate to people, and they will not follow you. But if you stammer and stutter and embarrass
yourself up there, you will win people’s hearts, and they will want to follow
you. That sounded so contrary, I thought
it must be very wise. But it didn’t
change the fact that I enjoyed speaking from stage. A similar “wise” saying I heard was to the
effect that, “Your greatest strength will become your greatest weakness, and
your greatest weakness will become your greatest strength.” Again, it is all about being relatable. Unfortunately, by the time I had heard that I
had burned through a lot of prospects trying to use my credibility, instead.
I had never been part of a sales organization
before. A lot of statements that sounded
incredibly wise and helpful to me were really old ideas, sometimes modified for
our particular goals. For example, being
materialistic was to “love things and use people.” Our great leaders encouraged us to follow
their example: “Use things and love people.”
Also, being materialistic was to “spend money you don’t have to buy
things you don’t need to impress people you don’t like.” We were taught to get out of debt and stay
out of debt. Then there was, “If you
always do what you have always done, you will always get what you have always
gotten.” “Insanity is doing the same
thing over and over and expecting a different result.” “A rut is just a grave
with the ends knocked out.” Then there
is the “law of sewing and reaping” and the “law of compensation,” both of which
are fairly self-explanatory. I won’t get
into them here. Also, the Napoleon Hill
quote: “What the mind of man can conceive and believe, it can achieve.” That was a deceptively compelling idea until
you realized what it means to really believe something. Hoping, praying and positive thinking don’t
cut it. In the end, then, if you are not succeeding, you don’t really believe
strongly enough, and therefore it is your own fault.
I really liked the idea: We know more or less how many
seeds there are in an apple, but…how many apples are there in a seed? In multi-level marketing you were going about
spreading or sprinkling seeds, knowing that some of them were going to take
root and eventually create whole orchards of trees, with hundreds of apples and
thousands of seeds to perpetuate the process. One of my favorite concepts had
to do with considering a scale of 1 to 10, where a really sharp, motivated,
charismatic, high-energy person who could succeed at nearly anything (a
“winner”) would be a 10, and of course the further away a person was from that
description, the closer to zero on this scale.
The speaker went on to say that each of us sees ourselves (our
self-image) a little lower than what is accurate, and we tend to see other
people a little higher than would be accurate.
As an exaggerated example, if I am really an 8, I may see myself as a 6,
but a prospect may see me as a 10. The
prospect may really be a 4 and see himself as a 2, but I see him as a 6. So I am really comfortable sponsoring him,
because I see him and myself as 6s.
What I needed to do under this concept was approach
people who I saw as 10s, because they are really 8s, and so am I, though I feel
like a 6. The kicker is that, unless we
really fight against it, we will always sponsor “down,” and the people we
sponsor will do the same, so that 8s will sponsor 6s, 6s will sponsor 4s, 4s will
sponsor 2s, and you end up with “the slugs of the earth” (the speaker’s
terminology) populating your business.
Not being one to back down from a challenge, I went ahead and approached
successful business leaders and professionals (doctors, lawyers, etc.) with
predictably dismal results. In the
absence of common sense, I had that strong, but inaccurate self-image that had
me preparing, as noted, to be a CFO of a publicly-traded company; to be a
platoon leader at a “young” 17-18 years of age and, come to think of it, a
husband at age 22 and homeowner and father of three while doing low-paying blue
collar work. I didn’t know what I was
doing, but I didn’t know that I didn’t know what I was doing!
After ten years of futility I was ready to hear a message
by Stephen Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People
and other books. He said that his
problem with books like How to Win Friends and Influence People (Dale
Carnegie) was that they taught you to act
a certain way, rather than to be a certain
way; that real and lasting success has to be consistent with who you are. You cannot maintain an act. By this time I understood that multi-level
marketing is all about maintaining close personal relationships over a long
period of time. Try maintaining an act over a long period of time! Again, the message I was getting and
believing was that I could change, if I tried hard enough. One speaker said, “If you don’t like the kind
of fish you are catching, you need to change the bait. And guess what…you are the bait.”
There is an axiom in sales that in order to convince
others you must first convince yourself; or instead of trying to “sell” others,
sell yourself and the rest will follow.
Unfortuntely, it also holds that in order to deceive other people you
must first deceive yourself. One of the
first tapes I heard was a talk by a leading financial planner; another had been
a CPA with one of the top firms. As
mentioned, I thought to myself: I have that kind of credibility. I can tell people my background and they will
be inclined to believe me and follow me.
Let’s not worry about the logical inconsistencies I was hearing or the
legitimate concerns, let’s just sponsor a lot of people using my credibility
and then let the support system of tapes and functions take over.
I noted and tried to ignore many almost laughable twists
of logic. There were several bible
verses that speakers would take out of context and twist the meaning of in
order to justify their points. For
example, “Without vision my people perish…” became the basis for emphasis on
the importance of having a “dream,” meaning having goals and desires that are
big enough and important enough to motivate you to succeed. The bible quote becomes the basis for saying,
“God says that if you don’t have a dream, you’re going to die!” In context, the ‘vision’ spoken of in the
bible means spiritual insight. I knew
that, but I hoped the people I sponsored wouldn’t catch on.
Another whopper was Jesus’ admonition to “love thy
neighbor.” This led to a discussion of
how, as Christians, we could best fulfill that commandment. It turns out that the best way would be to
show him the business opportunity and help him achieve financial freedom. As one speaker said, “What am I going to do,
mow his lawn for him? I ain’t gonna mow
his lawn for him! If I love him, to be
true to my faith, I need to show him the plan.”
(The 2 to 5 year plan to financial freedom). I could see right through that, but I hoped
no one else could. Along with “If I can
do it, you can do it,” was the bible quote to the affect that “God is no
respecter of persons.” In context this
meant that salvation was available to all, not just some. Speakers used it to suggest that if God has
allowed me to succeed, there is no
reason why He will not help you
succeed.
My point is that I worked hard at deceiving myself so
that I could deceive others, though I saw it as convincing myself so that I
could convince others. The principle is
more correctly put as: “If you would convince others, you must first convince
yourself.” And I am saying that you
could substitute the work “deceive” for the word “convince,” and you would get
an equally true statement. It is said
that the best, most convincing liars are the ones who, at some basic level,
though completely false, actually believe what they are telling you. One of the
diamonds said that he was really excited about the fact that he had some 10,000
people in his organization, because statistically 1% of all distributors go
diamond. That meant to him that he
should someday have around 100 diamonds in his organization. What it said to me was that there was about a
1% success rate. (I also hoped no one
else would catch that little fact). Again, building a long-term relationship
based on deception does not work, unless you are really good at it.
I wasn’t going to mention the specific name of the
multilevel marketing organization we are talking about here, because I am not
faulting that organization or anyone in the distributor organization to which I
belonged. The fault was all mine that I
was “clueless” enough not to recognize that I was not the type who could
maintain close personal relationships over long periods of time based on sets
of false premises, however well intentioned.
And I didn’t have the common sense to discern fact from fiction or to
handle the myriad of interpersonal issues that inevitably crop up in a business
based on personal relationships. Anyway,
I wanted to mention the “A word” and the “J word.” The first hurdle in approaching a prospect
was to get past the point in time when they first heard the word “Amway.” The
second was when they heard the word “Jesus.”
Our distributor organization was very bible-based. If you succeeded in getting a person to one
of the major meetings (held approximately quarterly) they were going to get two
ears full of bible-based Christianity.
So if you got them past the “A” word, you still had to get them past the
“J” word, or they were not going to be around long. This is a tall order for all but the most
charismatic of people (the 1%). Those
who bought into the A word and the J word had to then be charismatic enough to
continue the process. Very, very few
people fit that description. As alluded
to elsewhere, very few Christian “believers” have the self-image, motivation
and skill set to succeed at something like this.
We were taught that the ideal situation was “me and my
wife sitting down with him and his wife” in their home, building a relationship
and getting them excited about their financial future. In my naiveté I did not understand that most
people are not proud of their homes or their marriages or their finances, and
will make any number of plausible-sounding excuses not to let you see their
real selves. To make matters worse, I
often would “show the plan” to the man first and then try to get the plan in
front of them as a couple. Good luck
trying to get a man to get his wife to agree to meet with someone or some
couple when they don’t know what you are going to be talking about. So you have to show the man first, then he
goes home and tries to tell his wife, and she adamantly refuses to learn more
or get involved. And behind her
plausible-sounding excuses is the fact that she does not want the exposure to
their budget or their marriage or their home life, or something.
No comments:
Post a Comment